Difference Between Traditional Publishing vs. Self-Publishing – Hancock Publishers

Difference Between Traditional Publishing vs. Self-Publishing – Hancock Publisher

Now, authors have more options than ever when it comes to getting their work published. Isn’t that what we have always wished for as writers? No more being limited to sending manuscripts to publishing houses, hoping for acceptance.

With the rise of self-publishing, authors have more control and can bring their books to readers directly. This flexibility sounds fantastic, but it can also be a little confusing.

What is the best way to publish a book?

Should you try traditional publishing, or is self-publishing the better route?

This guide will take a close look at each of these options, comparing their benefits and drawbacks so you can make an informed decision. Traditional vs. Self-Publishing comparison will help you understand which publishing path might best suit your needs.

Understanding the Basics of Traditional and Self-Publishing

Traditional publishing involves working with a publishing house, which can be a major company or an independent press. This route usually requires an author to submit a manuscript to the publisher, either directly or through an agent. If the publisher accepts the manuscript, they cover the costs of editing, design, printing, and marketing. They also control the final version of the book and earn the majority of the book’s sales revenue.

Self-publishing allows authors to publish their books independently. You write, edit, design, and market the book on your own or by hiring professionals. Once it’s ready, you can publish through platforms like Amazon Kindle Direct Publishing (KDP), IngramSpark, or other digital and print-on-demand services. The author holds complete control over the book and earns a larger share of the revenue per sale.

Key Differences Between Traditional Publishing and Self-Publishing

Let’s dive deeper into the primary differences between these two options, with a detailed look at the pros and cons of publishing through each method.

1. Control Over the Book

In traditional publishing, control over the book largely rests with the publishing house. Once you sign a contract, the publisher may decide on the book’s final edits, cover design, and even the title. For some, this can be freeing, as it takes the pressure off and lets professionals take charge. However, for those who envision their book a certain way, this lack of control can be frustrating.

On the other hand, self-publishing gives you complete control. You choose your editor, cover designer, and marketing strategy. You decide how your book will look and how it will be priced. This level of control allows you to bring your unique vision to life, but it also means that you’re responsible for every detail.

2. Publishing Costs

Traditional publishing typically covers all costs associated with the book’s production. The publisher pays for the editor, designer, printing, and distribution. This is one of the main reasons many authors aim for traditional publishing – it allows you to publish a book without a major upfront investment.

With self-publishing, you’ll need to cover these expenses yourself. Costs for editing, cover design, and marketing can add up quickly, especially if you want a professional-quality product. However, there are options to keep costs manageable, such as hiring freelance editors or using book formatting software.

3. Earnings and Royalties

The earnings structure varies significantly in traditional vs. self-publishing. In traditional publishing, royalties are generally lower, ranging from 5% to 15% of the book’s sales. However, since the publisher bears the costs, these royalties come at no personal financial risk to the author.

In contrast, self-published authors typically earn higher royalties, often around 60% to 70% on platforms like Amazon KDP. While this can mean more profit per book sold, remember that self-publishing comes with upfront costs, and there’s no guarantee your book will sell well enough to cover these expenses.

4. Distribution and Reach

Traditional publishers have established networks for distributing books to bookstores, libraries, and online retailers, giving authors wider reach. Traditional publishing might be a better fit if you envision your book on bookstore shelves or in major libraries.

Self-publishing also offers broad reach, thanks to platforms like Amazon and IngramSpark. However, getting a self-published book into physical bookstores can be challenging. Many bookstores prefer traditionally published books, partly because they’re returnable to the publisher if they don’t sell, which isn’t always the case with self-published books.

5. Time to Publish

Traditional publishing can be a lengthy process. Between submitting your manuscript, finding an agent, going through rounds of editing, and scheduling a release date, it can take a year or even several years before your book hits the shelves.

Self-publishing, on the other hand, is much faster. Once your book is ready, you can publish it within days. For authors eager to get their work out there, the speed of self-publishing is a significant advantage.

Pros and Cons of Publishing Options

To make the decision easier, here’s a look at the pros and cons of publishing in both traditional and self-publishing.

Traditional Publishing

Pros:

  • Financial Support: The publisher covers the costs, so there’s no upfront financial risk.
  • Professional Resources: Access to professional editors, designers, and marketers.
  • Distribution: Broader reach in physical bookstores and libraries.
  • Prestige: Some writers feel traditional publishing adds a level of credibility to their work.

Cons:

  • Time-Consuming: The process can take years, from submission to publication.
  • Limited Control: The publisher makes the final decisions on edits, cover design, and even the title.
  • Lower Royalties: Authors earn a smaller percentage per book sold.

Self-Publishing

Pros:

  • Full Control: You oversee the book’s design, price, and distribution.
  • Higher Royalties: Authors retain a larger share of the profits.
  • Speed: Once the book is ready, you can publish it almost instantly.
  • Niche Potential: Perfect for niche or unconventional books that may not appeal to traditional publishers.

Cons:

  • Upfront Costs: Authors bear all production expenses.
  • Limited Physical Distribution: Self-published books are harder to get into bookstores.
  • Marketing Responsibility: You are in charge of promoting your book, which can be time-consuming and costly.

Which Option Is Right for You?

Choosing between traditional publishing and self-publishing depends on your goals, budget, and willingness to handle the business side of book publishing. Here are some scenarios that might help you decide:

  1. You want a well-established support system.
    Traditional publishing might be a good fit if you’re looking for guidance from professionals. A publishing house can help you navigate the process and provide resources that may be harder to access independently.
  2. You want a higher profit per book and creative control.
    If you value full control and are willing to take on the upfront costs, self-publishing could be a better choice. With higher royalties and creative freedom, self-publishing allows you to maintain your vision and potentially earn more from each sale.
  3. You’re publishing a niche book or want to publish quickly.
    Traditional publishers tend to focus on books with broad appeal, which may not suit niche topics. Self-publishing is often the better option for authors who want to target a specific audience or release their book quickly.
  4. You’re not comfortable with marketing and promoting the book yourself.
    Marketing is essential for book sales, and traditional publishers typically handle this aspect. If promoting your book sounds daunting, traditional publishing may help you reach your audience more effectively.

Financial Aspects: Costs, Earnings, and Royalties

One of the most significant differences between traditional publishing and self-publishing lies in the financial aspects, covering upfront costs, royalty structures, and long-term earnings potential. Deciding which path to take often depends on your budget, risk tolerance, and income expectations from your book.

1. Upfront Costs

Traditional Publishing

One major advantage of traditional publishing is that the publisher bears the costs associated with producing and distributing your book. These costs include professional editing, cover design, printing, and even marketing expenses. Because the publisher absorbs these expenses, there is no financial risk to the author upfront. However, this lack of initial cost comes with trade-offs. The publisher’s financial investment means they gain a greater share of control and, ultimately, a larger share of the profits per book sold.

Self-Publishing

In self-publishing, authors are responsible for all production costs. High-quality editing, a professionally designed cover, and formatting can easily add up. Editing alone can range from a few hundred to several thousand dollars, depending on the type and quality of editing you need. Cover design and formatting also come with costs, and for those planning on publishing physical copies, printing can add to expenses. However, these investments can be carefully managed, allowing authors to control their spending and prioritize what they believe is essential. Additionally, platforms like Amazon Kindle Direct Publishing (KDP) and IngramSpark provide print-on-demand services, eliminating the need for large print runs and helping authors avoid stockpiling unsold copies.

2. Royalties and Earnings Potential

Traditional Publishing

In traditional publishing, authors typically receive an advance payment against future royalties. Advances can vary widely, from a few thousand dollars for new authors to six-figure sums for well-known or bestselling writers. This advance is essentially a loan from the publisher, paid back through your book’s sales. Once the book begins to sell, the publisher keeps the revenue until the book “earns out” the advance. After this, authors begin to receive royalties, which are typically between 5% and 15% of the book’s cover price. While this royalty rate might seem low, it reflects the fact that the publisher covered the initial production and distribution costs.

Self-Publishing

Self-published authors generally earn a much higher royalty rate per book sale, often around 60% to 70% on platforms like Amazon KDP. This significant percentage allows authors to retain a larger share of the profit, especially if their book performs well. However, the potential for high earnings comes with a trade-off: self-published authors must fund the initial production costs, and there’s no guarantee of success. Earnings in self-publishing depend heavily on the author’s marketing efforts, the book’s appeal, and sometimes luck. Some self-published books earn substantial profits, while others may struggle to sell, impacting an author’s ability to recover their investment.

3. Long-Term Financial Implications

Traditional Publishing

Traditional publishers often retain long-term rights to the book, including foreign rights and adaptations. If your book is successful, they may secure deals for translations, film adaptations, or audiobooks, which can generate additional revenue. However, the publisher will typically keep a portion of these profits, and you may have limited control over these decisions.

Self-Publishing

Self-published authors hold full rights to their work, granting them complete control over future adaptations, translations, or merchandise. If your book finds an audience, these rights can be valuable assets, opening doors to additional income streams. Self-publishing allows authors to benefit directly from the book’s success without having to split profits with a publisher.

Self-Publishing Tips for Authors

If you decide to go the self-publishing route, here are a few self-publishing tips to help you succeed:

  1. Invest in Professional Editing: No matter how great a writer you are, a professional editor can elevate your work and catch errors you may have missed.
  2. Design a Professional Cover: A book cover is the first thing readers see, so make it count. A professional cover designer can make a big difference in attracting readers.
  3. Understand Your Distribution Options: Amazon is a great start, but consider using other platforms like IngramSpark to reach additional markets, such as bookstores and libraries.
  4. Create a Marketing Plan: Self-publishing means you’re in charge of getting your book noticed. Plan how you’ll reach readers, whether through social media, book reviews, or partnerships with influencers.
  5. Build Your Author Platform: Having a presence on social media, an author website, or a mailing list can help you build a community around your work and attract readers.

Traditional Publishing vs. Self-Publishing: Final Thoughts

Publishing is a journey, and there’s no one-size-fits-all answer. Whether you choose traditional publishing or self-publishing depends on your priorities, resources, and willingness to take risks. At Hancock Publishers, we have seen both paths where countless authors find success and also face their challenges. The most important thing is to understand each option’s advantages and limitations and pick the path that aligns best with your goals.

This Book Publishing Guide offers a snapshot of what to expect from traditional publishing and self-publishing. Whatever path you choose, remember that the most successful authors are those who adapt, learn, and persist.

FAQs

Subscribe to our Newsletter

Self-Publishing Resources

Ready to turn your manuscript into an eBook?

Turn your ideas into a best-seller with Hancock Publishers!

What are the main differences between traditional publishing and self-publishing?
Traditional publishing involves working with a publisher who covers production costs, manages distribution, and takes a higher percentage of royalties. Self-publishing allows authors complete control but requires them to cover production costs and handle marketing independently.
Which publishing option allows for more control over the book?
Self-publishing offers complete control over all aspects, from cover design to marketing strategy. Traditional publishing, however, involves sharing decision-making with the publisher, who has the final say on many elements of the book.
Do self-published authors earn more per sale than traditionally published authors?
Yes, self-published authors generally earn higher royalties per sale, often around 60-70% on platforms like Amazon. In traditional publishing, royalties are usually lower, between 5-15%, due to the publisher’s investment in production and distribution.
How long does it take to publish a book traditionally vs. self-publishing?
Traditional publishing can take a year or more from manuscript submission to publication, as it involves extensive review and scheduling. Self-publishing is much faster; once your book is ready, you can publish it within days.
What are the costs associated with self-publishing?
Self-publishing costs include editing, cover design, formatting, and potentially marketing. Authors can control these costs by choosing their service providers or handling certain tasks themselves, but quality work typically requires investment upfront.

Pitch Your Book Idea